How We Score Brokers

Transparent math. Public data sources. Updated every morning at 8 AM UTC.

The Formula AI Score = (Execution × 0.20) + (Cost × 0.20) + (Reliability × 0.15) + (Tools × 0.15) + (DayTraderFit × 0.20) + (Trust × 0.10)

Execution Speed

20%

What it measures

Fill quality and order routing transparency. Brokers that route orders directly to exchanges (rather than selling order flow to market makers) give traders better price improvement and faster fills — critical for scalpers and momentum traders.

Data source

SEC Rule 606 disclosures, which every broker must publish quarterly. These reports show the percentage of orders routed to market makers (payment for order flow) versus exchanges and dark pools. Filed on EDGAR.

How it scores

We take the broker's market maker routing percentage from their most recent 606 report. Lower routing to market makers = better direct market access = higher score.

Score = 99 − market_maker_routing_pct
Example: IBKR routes 8% to market makers → Score = 99 − 8 = 91

If a broker's 606 data is unavailable or pending, they receive a neutral score of 75 until updated.

Cost

20%

What it measures

Total cost of trading across stocks, options, and margin borrowing — the three expense categories that matter most to active day traders.

Data source

Broker fee schedules published on each broker's website, manually verified monthly by our team.

How it scores

Three components, weighted and normalized against the industry:

Cost Score = (Stocks × 0.40) + (Options × 0.30) + (Margin × 0.30)

Stocks: $0 = 99, $1/trade = 80, $5 = 40, $10 = 20
Options: $0/contract = 99, $0.65 = 85, $1 = 70, $2 = 40
Margin ($10K): <6% = 95, 6-8% = 80, 8-10% = 60, >10% = 40

Reliability

15%

What it measures

Platform uptime and stability. For day traders, an outage during market hours can mean missed entries, stuck positions, and real financial loss.

Data source

Public status pages operated by each broker (e.g., status.robinhood.com, status.fidelity.com). We check these daily for reported incidents.

How it scores

Rolling 30-day window. We count the number of reported incidents (outages, degraded service, partial failures).

Score = 99 − (incidents × 6)
Floor: 40 (even heavily-impacted brokers get a minimum)

0 incidents = 99, 1 = 93, 5 = 69, 10+ = 40

If a broker's status page is unreachable, we carry forward the previous day's score and flag it for manual review.

Platform & Tools

15%

What it measures

The quality and depth of the trading platform — charting, Level 2 data, hotkeys, API access, screeners, and order types available to active day traders.

Data source

Hand-curated by the DayTradeGPT team. We evaluate each platform quarterly based on feature availability, usability, and trader community feedback.

How it scores

An editorial score from 0-99 assigned by our team after platform review. Factors include: Level 2 data quality, hotkey customization, charting depth, API availability, scanner/screener tools, and order routing options.

Score = admin_curated_tools_score (0-99)
Updated quarterly · Last review: 2026-04-17

Day Trader Fit

20%

What it measures

How well-suited the platform is specifically for day trading workflows — short selling, PDT rules handling, mobile trading, futures access, and real-time data.

Data source

Broker documentation, feature pages, and published account policies.

How it scores

Composite of five sub-factors, each scored 0-99 then weighted:

Day Trader Fit = (ShortLocate × 0.25) + (PDT × 0.25) + (Mobile × 0.15) + (Futures × 0.15) + (Level2 × 0.20)

Short Locate (25%): Quality and availability of the borrow desk for short selling.
PDT Handling (25%): How the broker manages Pattern Day Trader rules — flexibility, margin options, workarounds.
Mobile Rating (15%): App store rating normalized to 0-99 scale.
Futures Access (15%): Whether futures trading is available and at what cost.
Level 2 Data (20%): Depth-of-market data availability and quality.

Trust & Support

10%

What it measures

Regulatory standing, customer protection, and recent news sentiment — the factors that determine whether you can trust a broker with your capital.

Data source

SIPC membership records, FINRA BrokerCheck regulatory history, and Google News RSS feeds scored for sentiment by Gemini AI.

How it scores

SIPC membership is a gate requirement — non-SIPC brokers receive a score of 0. Beyond that:

Base = 99
Subtract 10 per FINRA regulatory action in past year
Blend: (Regulatory × 0.70) + (News Sentiment × 0.30)

News sentiment scored 0-99 by Gemini AI using 5 recent headlines
Most brokers score 45-65 on sentiment in a normal week

Data Sources

Source Type Update Frequency Link
SEC Form 606 Order routing disclosure Quarterly EDGAR
Broker Status Pages Uptime / incident tracking Real-time (checked daily) Per-broker (linked on detail pages)
Broker Fee Schedules Commission & margin rates Monthly (manual refresh) Per-broker websites
Google News RSS News sentiment Daily Google News
FINRA BrokerCheck Regulatory history Quarterly BrokerCheck

Changelog

v2.0.0 2026-04-17 Launched Broker Power Rankings with six-metric AI Score